This is my first DFW though of course Infinite Jest has been on me
to-read purely to sate the redditor gremlin on my shoulder. I
deeply envious of writers like him, ear-to-the-ground and deeply
immersed and connected to the thrumming heart of Us and so so
witty. I have a running list of essayists in my head whose eyes I
want to steal; I want to live in their brains like a fly.
There's this general awe mixed with trepidation imbued
in the culture of the 90s to the early aughts (I wasn't even
cognizant then so I'm gleaning this from whatever media has
crossed over the barrier of time to me). It's the dawn of the
millennia and every thing is shiny and chrome but it's sullied by
the big FEAR - fear of the machine, fear of ourselves, fear of
what we've done to each other. It's like everyone is standing
agape at this rogue wave hoping it doesn't come crashing down on
them.
I think DFW would be satisfied/horrified to find how prescient his
piece is. Let's see: Celebrity culture? Check. Increasing
commodification of women? Check. Spiraling descent into filth and
abasement? Check. He couldn't have predicted the horror that is AI
and deepfake though - or those insane Terminator fleshlights. And
I'm glad to report he was wrong about snuff going mainstream.
Came across these beautiful watercolors of a black man and saw the artist was John Singer Sargent and I was like ??wahhh?? Turns out the story behind Sargent and this muse contains complicated intersections of race, class, sexuality, and artistry - very juicy stuff.
How far back does this macabre spectacle go? Did early humans revel in watching a saber tooth tiger down a mammoth? I think they did. Life is more interesting on the edge - or in this case viewing life from the edge is more interesting. Also I just love how comically dramatic the Victorians were. Any hint of the gothic and they’re there.
I was scared of returning to Kazuo Ishiguro because of how badly
disappointed I was in Never Let Me Go. But The Buried Giant was a
novel I unexpectedly loved. 1. Because of my aforementioned
experience 2. Because its a very capital E English fantasy. I
don't even remember the last time I read a typical fantasy novel
and with the dystopian I just read it seems like I'm on a genre
tour. Maybe I'll read a pulp western next to round everything out.
The Buried Giant doesn't seem like a typical fantasy to me though.
The tone of it reminds me of magical realism works in that the
fantastical elements read as so prosaic (it helps that I know next
to nothing about Arthurian England) that I can fully believe back
then ogres and pixies and dragons really did live amongst people.
As for the setting and dialogue it took very little time to get
immersed in both. I love a good craggy outlook and rolling
hillside. The dialogue reminded me a bit of Shakespeare? In that
kind of overexplaining quaint way his characters speak. Like a
cross between Shakespeare and fairytale. I loved the dialogue
actually.
The cast was similar to Piranesi in a way. They're one-dimensional
like characters from a fairytale. And therefore very pure and
guileless. This pastoral background combined with these kind and
noble characters made it all the more shocking when scenes of
violence and cruelty happen. At first it was laced in but as the
plot started materializing it became central to the story.
Absolutely heartbroken by Axl and Beatrice. Good simple characters
with a lived in love. Their devotion to each other... I did cry at
the end. Actually I was on the verge of tears for the last few
chapters.
This book restored my faith in Ishiguro. The way the plot threads
weaved together in the end was so graceful and just so well put
together. And his message of war and forgiveness and revenge and
death was so poignant... There was no villian in this story. It
pulling between people trying to cope with their loyalty and anger
and loss.
Sidenote: the warrior took on this really erotic image in my head
so I was getting distracted every time he showed up...
I think this was the first thing in my reading list when I got my first phone. It’s a straightforward story about class inequality told through a dystopian setting (what’s new). I love the premise, the Inception-like contortion of the city is such an awesome, impossible image. And I tend to like these papery main characters like Lao Dao - ones that aren’t fighting to move the plot along but are instead conduits used to feel out the world. These kinds of characters are rare in American lit, which says a lot about our societal ideals lmao.
A continuation of my infinite space readings. This is my first Borges and tbh at times I found the text near inscrutable. The main gist is clear, though I don’t follow the logic in the narrator’s thinking that the library is infinite therefore periodic. I enjoyed the cult-ish parts the most. It’s so pathetic yet noble of humans to devote their lives to a pursuit so impossible. I may get to the rest of Ficciones after my next read.
Incredibly stunning book. I wanted to read it all in one sitting
but I didn't want it to end so soon. But I think the short length
was perfect. There's enough time to sit and stew in the
world-building but the plot moves fast enough to always keep the
reader unmoored.
Firstly the setting: on a sliding scale for books about infinite
homes Piranesi and House of Leaves are on complete opposite ends
(I've been wanting to reread HoL but I don't remember where the
fuck I put my copy -_-). The House in Piranesi is so beautiful
because of its contradictions: the austerity and nobility of the
statues that are eroded by the tides and desecrated by birds, the
vast and looming power of the waves and clouds that are contained
within mere halls and windows. It's an almost disconcerting blend
of nature and architecture - the flowing and the rigid.
(Unstoppable force vs immovable object anyone?) But the narrator
has such a reverence for the House it's impossible not to also be
in awe.
I think this is one of my favorite narrators of all time. He has
such a genuine, innocent way of seeing the world it almost made me
cry. His monologue was so endearing in the sincerity of his
thoughts and the pure wonder and respect he held his world in.
When he was at the fawn statue and believed it was saying "Hush!
Be comforted!" to him my heart broke. And the way he described
putting pretty shells and bones in his hair was so!!!!!
Awhile ago when I was reading about Hegel, one intro to an essay
emphasized that in ancient times thinking and philosophy was
centered on how man fits into the universe. Actually how
everything is slotted together. And as we've moved into modern
times the thinking has gone to (strayed to?) man as the
individual; he is a universe in and of himself. These historical
shifts in thinking play a large part in the narrator's journey. In
the House he is amongst endless nature and literal classical
marble statues, he is entwined with the world and believes that as
he cares for it, it cares for him - man and universe working in
harmony.
"the Beauty of the House is immeasurable; its kindness infinite"
Wow... Ok for context my americana obsession would inevitably go
down that sprawling road towards Faulkner. It’s just a shame it
took this long. From the opening the book is imbued with dread. It
gave me the same feeling as reading And Then There Were None – the
anticipation of watching everyone drop like flies. I can
definitely see how Cormac McCarthy was influenced by Faulkner –
obviously genre-wise but also a style of writing I describe as
fill in the gap. Like describing events and scenes through
snapshots and feelings rather than linearly. Leaves lots of room
in between which gets very confusing and abstract and so fun to
read.
The style leans especially well to action, particularly the scene
where Jewel is mounting his horse: it’s as if you’re supposed to
read through the passage quickly and not linger on details to
really /feel/ the movement, like stepping back from a Pollock.
And the voices, god so strange and spiraling and serpentine but
not pushed too hard to caricature. A lot of the times reading this
book it’s like my senses know what’s going on before my mind.
Which ig is one of the boons of stream of consciousness. And it
was fun to interpret how everyone grieved thru the lens of like 10
other people. I could go on about the themes but I can’t put my
thoughts into words rn.